Sunday, October 6, 2013

Shakespeare and...?


When should technology be used in an English classroom?  

Where does it fit? Wedged between Shakespeare and sentence frames?  Book-ending Emily Dickinson and Poe? Is a beautiful accessory useful in conveying traditional learning or supplementing a traditional curriculum?  Or does technology and the modern era call for a revolution of language learning and communication?  Will the classics die in a tidal wave of informational texts and graphically embellished electronic novels?
 Could our modern culture be advancing at such a rate as to finally put Shakespeare himself  (at least in his printed form) in the musty edges of a cultural grave?

As lovers of literature, we hope that day will never come.  But we must embrace the benefits of using technology to connect with our students and their learning.

Tom Whitby, in his October 1st blog post entitled "Do We Really Need Connected Educators?" relates the imperative of digital literacy in education:
"...access is no longer limited to a select few, but rather it is available to anyone who is digitally literate...Ubiquitous access is one reason why digital literacy is now going to be taught in American schools as we move forward. Students in our school system today will be given the keys to the information lock boxes of our society for their consumption".
Students now have access to thousands of years of knowledge acclimation at their fingertips.
But though they have the keys, they may not be using them to unlock said 'lock boxes'.  As we are learning as future educators, students need a reason to search out the information.   And I believe that it is a humanistic connection students need to make with the material in order to peak their interest.  Literature builds a humanistic connection in an incredibly deep way.  Reading allows us to participate in the writer's creation, through activating our imaginations, instead of filling them with completed images, as video games, movies, and technologically based learning usually do.  And we need to understand the writers of the past, in the context of our shared humanity, in order to fully understand our human state.  But technology appears to be the 'language' of our students.  The question then becomes: if our students speak the language of technology, how do we 'translate' the meaningful influence of great literature into a relevant format?


At this point early in my career as an educator, I believe that technology can never substitute for:


  • Authentic reading:  Students can use technology to aid reading, such as Kindle, iPad, computer, iPhone, ect., but no matter the depth of the technological tool, nothing will ever replace the educational value of reading.  Reading is essential in all learning, and literacy is the foundation of education and academia, and there is little evidence that academic learning will ever be effective without a reading component.  
  • Face-to-Face conversations and collaboration:  social media and google docs are great for collaborating on projects and working on assigned tasks.  But have you ever noticed how hard it is to brainstorm and converse naturally in a 'physically separated' environment?  Nothing beats being able to see the faces of the people you are working with, and brainstorming is so much easier, and I believe more enriching and effective, in person.  
  • Note-taking and writing: it's extremely easy to type out notes.  A good typist's fingers respond nearly automatically to the words being communicated, with little thought processing.  Its much easier to remember the things you manually write down, and for junior highers, many or whom do not have access to a working computer or printer, this is one of their only options for most of their coursework.
  • Real books and classic authors:  nothing will ever fully replace a real book.  New authors will come and go, their works drifting about on the scales of cultural value.  I am all for new writings and diverse authorship. But the voices of the classics have called loudly out to humanity for many years, and there is likely good reason.  Our culture will shift and change, and so will our values, but good writing remains because it continually reveals to us our unarguable and un-aging utter human nature.  Our literary cannon can grow, but it should never be reduced. 

Technology is beautiful as a tool to gather information and communicate in conjunction with the foundation of original texts and unique ideas. I believe that using technology to open the gates of communication for our students is central to their development as young learners.  But the learning should not be fully encompassed in the act of communicating or acquiring information, but rather in the ideas and concepts that are being communicated. Below are a listing of activities that I believe are ideal for technological supplement:


  • Group work on assigned tasks: once group work has been brainstormed and assigned(perhaps in class), technological wonders such as google docs create an ideal workspace and allow for distance communication and simple collaboration.  
  • Access to articles and informative texts:  Save the earth, and preserve trees. For a brief reading of a homework assignment article for high school students, online access is great.  
  • Optional assignments and extra credit
  • Presentations: video clips and multi-media art
  • Responses to literary works: blogs, websites, multi-media art...
  • Online quizes and forums 
  • Submission of essays
  • Dictionary access for at home use
  • Plagiarism checks





6 comments:

  1. Jubilee, you mentioned in your later list that technology can provide access to informative texts and articles. I think that students are often quite curious about what they learn in class, and technology gives the opportunity to follow through with that curiosity. It also provides various forms of text and media that can support students' learning about something that interests them, or that was introduced in class.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jubilee,
    Very impressive and well-written blog post. You should consider submitting it as a guest post on one of the popular Education websites (e.g., http://www.edutopia.org/contact-us). Your post really conveys your struggles as you figure out how to navigate between the old and new (e.g., classics and technology) in an English classroom. Excellent job!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Really fun to read your post Jubilee. Your post made me think: when students use technology, what type of information are they usually being exposed to: visual, audio, or textual? During their free time, they seem mostly to be playing video games, watching YouTube videos, and checking Instagram (visual and audio information), but someone please tell me if I'm wrong!. My hunch is that the hours they log with these video/audio activities train them to be attracted to these stimuli and avoid textual stimuli (which are really stimulating if you allow them to be :). So, when a teacher tries to give students activities to do on computers or tablets that involve textual/audio/visual stimuli, they ignore the text. I've seen this happen in middle school science computer lab activities. So, if this is actually a problem (and not just a figment of my imagination) .... what the heck do we do?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I was caught by your opinion on face to face interaction, for I too believe in the need for interpersonal skills that one acquires through in person interactions. You specifically were talking about the difficulty in conversation and collaboration without the ability to see each member's face. My question to you pertains to this "face to face" interaction. Last week we analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of two types of technology, one of which was Skype, or any other video conferencing program. Do you believe that a group could get the same sense of such a face to face situation using one of these programs? Or is there absolutely nothing comparable to in person conversation?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I did consider Skype in those terms, but I would rather hear from everyone else about this, because I feel a bit conflicted.
    I would open that question up to anyone who is willing to answer: do Skype and face-to-face conversation offer identical or similar benefits in the realm of academic collaboration, relationship building, brainstorming, and general interaction?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Jubilee!
    I love your gracious credo: "At this point early in my career as an educator, I believe that technology can never substitute for..." And I love how passionately and wholly you communicated what a lot of us sense as a vague uneasiness somewhere in our murky conception of what it means to love the present, the physical, the tangible. Real faces and real books cannot be replaced, as you say. And then you add that real note-taking and real book-reading can't be replaced either! I love that you argue not that these be un-technological experiences, but firmly that they must be authentic. And at this point in the evolution of technology, it can't be proven that those activities are more effective on an iPad-- maybe they're even less effective. Bravo. I'm tucking away your arguments for future debates about whether funding should go towards iPads or bigger libraries. :)

    ReplyDelete